‘Straight Pride’ March Outside Abortion Clinic Clashes with 200 Protesters – Progressives Have Created Reactive Abuse Responses from Groups They Target

‘Straight Pride’ March Outside Abortion Clinic Clashes with 200 Protesters – Progressives Have Created Reactive Abuse Responses from Groups They Target

If these “straight pride” guys are going to go on straight pride marches or parades, they need to defend single, celibate, hetero adults, not just the “nuclear family.”

In the past few years, progressives have so often and regularly demonized white people, heterosexuals, conservatives, and Christians (and shaming those persons for being white, hetero, conservative and/or Christian), I can now honestly see a need for things like “hetero pride” marches and so forth.

The left only has themselves to blame for this sort of thing – if they didn’t cram their views about sexuality, race, etc, so much down other people’s throats and scream and yell at anyone who disagrees that they are “white supremacists” and bigots and so on,
you wouldn’t see the affected groups go into reactive mode and hold “straight pride” parades and so on in response.

When you continually smear, pick at, demonize, and abuse someone (or an entire group of people), they may eventually respond by abusing you back.

That is where this non-stop, ‘drip- drip- drip’ of far left liberal abuse of conservatives, Christians, and other groups can lead.

Progressives, far left liberals, and Democrats are creating some of the very situations and attitudes they complain about all the time.

Edit. I just found this second link about the event… sorry, but if it’s OK for other groups to declare their “pride” at being X (whatever X is), it’s okay for heterosexuals to declare they’re “proud” of being straight.

(Link):  Cops pull guns and fire pepper balls as California ‘straight pride’ march outside abortion clinic clashes with pro-LGBT protestors

August 28, 2022

A ‘straight pride’ march held in front of a California abortion clinic descended into violence as attendees clashed with counter-protesters and police.

The National Straight Pride Coalition touted the event as a celebration of ‘heterosexuality, masculinity, femininity, babies – born and unborn and Western straight civilization, our wonderful country and Christianity.’

…But it quickly descended into violence, as angry pro-LGBT rights groups clashed with officers deployed to maintain calm at the event.

…A large contingent of LGBTQ and pro-choice counter-protesters who took offense to the message behind the march also showed up – and violence ensued.

Continue reading “‘Straight Pride’ March Outside Abortion Clinic Clashes with 200 Protesters – Progressives Have Created Reactive Abuse Responses from Groups They Target”

Black Guys Attack Homosexual Couple for Being Homosexual – Trouble in Intersectional Clown World

Black Guys Attack Homosexual Couple for Being Homosexual – Trouble in Intersectional Clown World

The article (linked to below) has photos of the assailants. As it turns out, a couple of black guys assaulted a homosexual couple for being homosexual.

The two men mentioned in the headline are black men – the news page has photos of the guys on it.

Liberals, progressives, and Democrats, put everyone in a hierarchy of victimhood (“intersectionalism”). Hard to say how the typical woke idiot would interpret this story – would they side with the assaulted homosexual couple or would they excuse the actions of the black assailants?

(In the past, the woke have actually told white women that if they’re raped by a “person of color” that they should not contact the police to report the rape. I kid you not. That is how vile, sexist, immoral, demonic, and evil the woke and their beliefs are.)

While I am no supporter of progressives trying to harass or pressure Christian bakers into baking cakes for homosexual weddings, I sure don’t support black guys attacking homosexual couples. That’s not okay, either.

(Link): DC police searching for 2 men accused of attacking gay couple

Witness to DC attack said she thought suspects were going to kill victims

By Pilar Arias | Fox News
August 10, 2022

A gay couple says they were accused of having monkeypox and were attacked in Washington, D.C.’s Shaw neighborhood Sunday evening. The couple adds that the attack took place due to their sexual orientation.

Washington D.C. police confirmed they are investigating the weekend incident as a possible hate crime and released pictures of two people of interest.

Continue reading “Black Guys Attack Homosexual Couple for Being Homosexual – Trouble in Intersectional Clown World”

The Obnoxious Abuse Survivor Community Is Targeting Julie Roys Again – this time begun by R L Stollar

The Obnoxious Abuse Survivor Community Is Targeting Julie Roys Again – this time the witch hunt was begun by R L Stollar

The “abuse survivor community” has taken their pitchforks out again, and again their pitchforks and torches are for journalist Julie Roys.

This time, the bullying is being carried out by a R L Stollar, a name I’ve seen on twitter off and on in the last few years.

I believe he originally began speaking out against harms caused by Christian homeschooling? Good on him for that (I mean that, that was not snark).

Beyond that, though, I’m not familiar with Stollar. He may have even tweeted a few things in the past I saw shared by others I follow on Twitter that I agreed with.

To Julie Anne (“Defend the Sheep” on twitter) – why are you  participating in this continued pile on?

(Edit: I believe Julie Anne “Liked” some of the comments in that thread, or I saw her share it on her Twitter account, which is how I became aware of it in the first place)

Why are you, Julie Anne, continuing to associate with people who behave this way?
I’m sorry if you feel that Roys did not credit you or friends of yours or whatever on older reportage she did (which she tried to discuss with you), but what is the deal with cozying up to the people singling her out every few weeks?

Anyway. Roys is being bullied online again, and this time it was started by Stollar.

Yes, I said “again” – see (Link): my previous post about this weird, disturbing anti-Roys obsession from the Amy Smiths, Ashley Easters, and other so-called abuse survivor advocates.

If you take note of this obnoxious behavior, as I did, (that is, noting their bullying and mob mentality where they target someone), some of them will erroneously misconstrue you as being a “Julie Roys Stan,” or use that as an ad hominem against you (see embedded tweets below for more on that).

Birth Control Movie

Now, the “abuse survivor community” is targeting Roys for having once appeared in a several years old (conservative created, I believe) movie about birth control and the sexual revolution.

I’ve not seen the movie they are referring to, but I did watch and listen to a clip of Roys presumably from the film (that clip located in a tweet by someone else here), and the comments Roys made were pretty conventional.

There was  nothing “far out” there by Roys in that clip, not unless, I suppose, you’re operating from a faulty, far left liberal paradigm, in which case pointing out that sexual behaviors with little- to- no boundaries can result in things like disease or other harmful ramifications will sound judgmental, fuddy duddy, and stodgy.

Speaking of which:

(Link): Monkeypox virus could become entrenched as new STD in the US – via ABC News (warning: auto-playing video file with audio on that page)

Excerpts:

The spread of monkeypox in the U.S. could represent the dawn of a new sexually transmitted disease, though some health officials say the virus that causes pimple-like bumps might yet be contained before it gets firmly established

By Mike Stobbe AP Medical Writer
July 22, 2022

… So far, more than 2,800 U.S. cases have been reported as part of an international outbreak that emerged two months ago. About 99% have been men who reported having sex with other men, health officials say.
— end excerpts —

Secular Criticisms of Birth Control and the Sexual Revolution

In the past year, a few secular books criticizing the consequences of the sexual revolution (including the role of the advent of birth control pills) have been published
(which I’ve blogged about here (Where the Sexual Revolution Went Wrong by Maria Albano) and here (The Sexual Revolution Has Backfired on Women by S. Moore),
so it’s not only those evangelicals all you hipster “Exvangelicals” despise pointing out the flaws and dangers with no-holds-barred sexual behavior.

In the past few years, more and more liberals and feminists have been speaking out about the excesses and harms of loose sexual behavior; these are just a couple of examples on my blog:

(Link): Why Sex-Positive Feminism is Falling Out of Fashion by S. Greenberg – excerpts via New York Times

(Link): Did Hell Freeze Over?: Liberal Rag Promotes Idea that Celibacy is Acceptable, and a Valid Life Choice / Re: 2016 Study Says Millennials Aren’t Having Much Sex

Progressives / Abuse Advocates Define Christianity to = Democrat Party, Progressive Values and Views

Many of the abuse advocates under consideration in this blog post I am discussing are politically driven (or some have left-leaning sympathies).

They conflate Christianity with leftism, progressive views, causes, and the Democratic Party, and reject anyone who doesn’t agree with all their socio-political views.

Here is my reaction to what got the ball rolling (tweet link – my comment – and here is a link to the original R L Stollar comment I was replying to):

Link to Tweet embedded below.

So this Stollar guy initially did a tweet with a link to this page (also linked to below, with excerpt) at Right Wing Watch – of course he did.

Does Stollar ever follow sites with names like “Left Wing Watch” (i.e., any accounts that are critical of progressive ideology?) – probably not.

Continue reading “The Obnoxious Abuse Survivor Community Is Targeting Julie Roys Again – this time begun by R L Stollar”

First it Was Christian Complementarians Telling Me To Shut Up, Then Trans Activists, and Now, It’s Intersectional Feminist, Black, Pro-Choice Tik Tokers

First it Was Christian Complementarians Telling Me To Shut Up, Then Trans Activists, and Now, It’s Intersectional Feminist, Black, Pro-Choice Tik Tokers

I actually did a post covering similar territory a few weeks ago – I noted in that post how members of the progressive transgender movement constantly tell women to shut up – as did the Christian gender complementarians I grew up with, or whose teachings I was exposed to, as my parents were Southern Baptists, and Baptists push that sexist tripe but claim it’s “biblical.”

I’ve also seen secular (and religious) conservative men either imply all women should shut up, or they suggest that all women should not have the right to vote (I wrote about that here, among other posts I’ve done on the topic)

Now, here we have a black, pro-choice woman on Tik Tok insisting that white women shut up.

I’m part white but also part Native American. I will not shut up. If I have an opinion and want to express it, I will express it.

I don’t allow church, complementarians, progressives, trans activists, pro choicers, or sexist conservatives to silence me or tell me what to do.

(Link): ‘If you value your life…shut the f*** up’: CRAZY MAD TikToker threatens white women over Roe reversal

‘This is what happens when social media gives people who used to take classes in the basement and wear a helmet a platform’

by BlazeTV Staff
June 30, 2022

On the latest episode of “Fearless,” BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock and contributor Shemeka Michelle try to make sense of a very angry TikToker’s racist rant about the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

“So, we all see what has happened with this Roe v. Wade situation. We already knew this was how it was going to go down,” said the blue-lipped TikToker and self-described “Priestess Warrior.”

“Dear white women, listen. Your only play in this, if you value your life, is to shut the f*** up!” she continued.

Continue reading “First it Was Christian Complementarians Telling Me To Shut Up, Then Trans Activists, and Now, It’s Intersectional Feminist, Black, Pro-Choice Tik Tokers”

Queer Owned Business Shut Down by Employees For Not Being Woke Enough – by Libs Of Tik Tok – Another Journey Into Intersectional Clown World

Queer Owned Business Shut Down by Employees For Not Being Woke Enough – by Libs Of Tik Tok – Another Journey Into Intersectional Clown World

(Link): Queer-owned business shut down by employees for not being woke enough

Excerpts:

by Libs of Tik Tok
July 5, 2022

Mina’s World, a cafe in Philadelphia that prided itself in being “Queer-owned,” has officially closed its doors after a woke employee revolt. The cafe was owned by Kate Egghart and Sonam Parikh, two queer activists who started Mina’s in an effort to create an inclusive coffee shop.

However, their employees have claimed Egghart and Parikh are anti-black and “gentrifiers.” Gentrifier is a woke term used to describe those who purposely contribute to the displacement of low-income families.

Continue reading “Queer Owned Business Shut Down by Employees For Not Being Woke Enough – by Libs Of Tik Tok – Another Journey Into Intersectional Clown World”

Leftist Intersectional Feminism is An Anti-White Woman Belief System: Progressives Once More Blame White Women For How They Voted

Leftist Intersectional Feminism is An Anti-White Woman Belief System: Progressives Once More Blame White Women For How They Voted

Women (and men) who believe in and practice Intersectional Feminism hate white women.

Racism, contra progressives and their dippy neo-Marxist beliefs, is not just about who has power in a culture, but it’s also an attitude – and I see plenty of non-whites who are racist against white people.

It doesn’t take a position of power to harbor racism or sexism against others, anyone is capable of it.

Women can be sexist against men, even though men tend to have more authority in culture.

Furthermore, women (and the men) who advocate for Intersectional Feminism fully accept the misogynistic movement known as “Trans Rights Activism,” which consists of a lot of narcissistic biological men who insist every one call them by female pronouns and be permitted into women’s locker rooms, so they can flash their nude penises at actual women, and so they can have access to women’s prisons if arrested, so that they can rape actual women.

The only white women who go along with any of this glaringly obvious sexism  are liberal white women who allow themselves to be gas-light and are easily lured into guilt trips by “POC” women.

As I’ve long pointed out on this blog, (and though I am a conservative), I’ve noted that both the right and left of the American political spectrum are sexist. Both sides each have their own issues and end up mistreating women.

Earlier today, this editorial by Pamela Paul was published by the New York Times:

(Link): The Far Right and Far Left Agree on One Thing: Women Don’t Count – hosted on The New York Times, July 3, 2022, by Pamela Paul

That editorial, which I’m largely in agreement with (though not on the portion where the author laments the over turn Roe V Wade, since I am pro-life, but I do recognize that many conservatives can be sexist on other topics) angered progressive women.

The author, Paul, was hounded off Twitter; her account was suspended.

Anyway, according to this article on Fox News, progressive women began attacking the editorial and/or the author herself, and some even jumped in to bash white women for some having had voted for Trump back in 2016 – more on this below the link and excerpt:

(Link): Washington Posts columnists slam a New York Times op-ed that criticizing the ‘far left’ for erasing women

July 3, 2022

Fellow progressives echoed her criticism of the New York Times op-ed.

By Lindsay Kornick | Fox News

Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah blasted the New York Times on Twitter Sunday for an op-ed that criticized progressives for erasing women.

The Times published a Sunday op-ed titled “The Far Right and Far Left Agree on One Thing: Women Don’t Count” in which, columnist Pamela Paul argued how the far left’s concern for appealing to a transgender minority is belittling and rebuking women.

“Tolerance for one group need not mean intolerance for another. We can respect transgender women without castigating females who point out that biological women still constitute a category of their own — with their own specific needs and prerogatives,” Paul wrote.

Specifically, she called out the insistence of using terms such as “pregnant people” and “menstruators” to avoid using the general word “women” out of fear of offending a small group. Paul even equated this with what she considered to be “stripping women of fundamental rights” by overturning Roe v. Wade.

Although Attiah did not cite or link the article on her account, she blasted this comparison as an example of “both-sides pattycake.”

“That NYT op-ed equating inclusive language to widespread legislative oppression is a reminder that many white, cis women would rather gatekeep and maintain privilege than work in solidarity with other groups. Patriarchy is crushing us, but y’all wanna play both-sides pattycake,” Attiah tweeted.

She also added “I’m a cis woman who is clearly able to see that we are under a system-wide assault on bodily autonomy and reproductive rights. We will need a politics of solidarity and community building to resist this, which is not something that white women have historically had to do.”

She concluded her thread sharing another Twitter thread criticizing the failures of white women to help their communities.

“This tweet thread on white women and their failures with community building is worth a look. Read, then discuss amongst yourselves,” Attiah tweeted.

Other progressive journalists voiced their support for Attiah’s comments.

The Daily Beast’s Wajahat Ali tweeted “Majority of white women voted for Trump both times and have voted Republican since the 1950s. Whenever someone brings this up apparently its very offensive but those are the receipts.”

… Attiah’s thread was also retweeted by far-left commentator Keith Olbermann and failed progressive congressional candidate Nina Turner.
— end excerpts —

So there we have, once again, white women being shamed and blamed for how they voted by liberals and progressives, an activity which white conservative men also periodically engage in.

Continue reading “Leftist Intersectional Feminism is An Anti-White Woman Belief System: Progressives Once More Blame White Women For How They Voted”

Transgender Lutheran Bishop Gets Bullied Out of Church Over Supposed Racism – Intersectionalism Clown World

Transgender Lutheran Bishop Gets Bullied Out of Church Over Supposed Racism – Intersectionalism Clown World

Irony. A transgender pastor (I think this is a biological man pretending to be a woman(?) – or is this a biological woman pretending to be a man?), who uses the pronoun “they,” (eye roll),  got another pastor (a Nelson Rabell-Gonzalez) at the same church fired, and now the congregants are construing that and several other non-racist actions by the trans pastor as being “racist.”

The trans guy is claiming the harassment is so bad that he had to wear a bullet proof vest to some church services.

Progressive Intersectionalism, LOL!

Usually in the Hierarchy of Victimhood, progressives put Transgenders at the top, but in this case, they’re choosing the Latino church members above the trans guy.

(Link): First transgender bishop of largest Lutheran denomination resigns

June 7, 2022

The first transgender bishop of the largest Lutheran denomination in the United States has resigned amid criticism over the decision to remove the pastor of a Latino congregation on the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe in December.

…Rohrer, who uses they/their/them pronouns, had been criticized by the Asociación de Ministerios Latinos de la ELCA as showing a “lack of empathy and understanding toward their Latinx siblings” for removing the Rev. Nelson Rabell-González on one of the most culturally significant and sacred days for Latinos.

(Link): ELCA trans bishop resigns following allegations of racism, disciplinary process

By Michael Gryboski, Mainline Church Editor

The first trans-identified bishop in the history of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America has resigned amid allegations of racism and other issues.

Bishop Megan Rohrer, who is a female but uses “they/them” pronouns, posted a statement on Facebook Monday explaining that she was stepping down as bishop of the Sierra Pacific Synod.

… Shortly after being installed as bishop, allegations surfaced that Rohrer had engaged in unethical behaviors, including the purportedly racist firing of Pastor Nelson Rabell-Gonzalez of Misión Latina Luterana and litigation surrounding Rohrer’s actions as pastor of Grace Lutheran Evangelical Church of San Francisco, among other matters.

(Link): Transgender Lutheran Bishop Resigns over Racism Allegations

Excerpts:

– Associated Press – Tuesday, June 7, 2022

LOS ANGELES — An openly transgender cleric from San Francisco, who made history last year with an appointment as a bishop by the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, has resigned amid allegations of racism after firing the pastor of a predominantly Latino congregation.

The Rev. Megan Rohrer, who uses the pronoun “they,” led one of the church’s 65 synods, overseeing nearly 200 congregations in Northern California and northern Nevada. They were elected in May 2021 to serve a six-year term as bishop of the Sierra Pacific Synod.

In a letter to the synod Saturday, Rohrer said they were resigning because of “the constant misinformation, bullying and harassment” they experienced after the synod voted to remove the pastor of Mision Latina Luterana on Dec. 12, the Feast of the Virgin of Guadalupe, a significant holiday for congregants of the Stockton, California, church.

Rohrer fired the Rev. Nelson Rabell-Gonzalez after an investigation by the church into verbal harassment and retaliation allegations against the pastor, all of which he has denied. The synod council voted on Dec. 11 to vacate Rabell-Gonzalez’s call as a mission developer and to terminate his employment after they said he refused to fulfill certain mandatory requirements.

Rohrer was not available to speak with The Associated Press on Tuesday, saying they were “trying to rest and be with my family.”

Continue reading “Transgender Lutheran Bishop Gets Bullied Out of Church Over Supposed Racism – Intersectionalism Clown World”

UK Muslim Rape Gangs Abused 1,400 Girls in Rotherham, Not A Single Cop Lost His Job

UK Muslim Rape Gangs Abused 1,400 Girls in Rotherham, Not A Single Cop Lost His Job 

Headlines below: “Asian” is used to denote Muslims in British press – it’s not referring to Chinese, Korean, Japanese, etc. persons, as the term is used in the United States.

You know that awful Melody Kay Young doesn’t care about these white girls getting raped – not when the rapists are a part of that “Intersectional POC Victim Totem Pole” bullshit progressives love!

(I’m pretty sure it’s Melody Kay Young – before I blocked her on Twitter years ago. She pitched a fit when a link I sent to Dee of Wartburg Watch in a Tweet was re-Tweeted by Dee about Muslim grooming gangs who were systemically targeting white British girls for rape in Europe.
She Tweeted at Dee in reply that she was worried that sharing such accurate reporting would make all Muslims look bad, FFS. She showed zero concern for the rape victims.)

(Link): NOT ONE! Rape victim’s fury after no cops are sacked over Asian [Muslim] sex gang failures

by Paul Sims

NOT one cop was sacked over failures that left Asian gangs free to abuse young white girls, a watchdog’s report has revealed.

Up to 1,400 girls as young as 11 were drugged, raped and pimped by gangs in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013.

But an officer told one victim’s dad they could do nothing to stop the abuse as it might provoke racial tension, the report reveals.

Police told another parent “streetwise” white girls saw older Asian men as a “fashion accessory” but would “grow out of it”.

A rape victim was told her ordeal would teach her a lesson. And a girl was even arrested after being found with her tormentor.

…Most cops had retired and were beyond the reach of disciplinaries. The rest were given “words of advice” or a final warning.

 Sammy Woodhouse was 15 when she gave birth to ringleader Arshid Hussain’s son after repeated rapes.

… [The probe] found police were indifferent to victims’ suffering and concluded some girls had consented to sexual acts and were equally to blame.

Continue reading “UK Muslim Rape Gangs Abused 1,400 Girls in Rotherham, Not A Single Cop Lost His Job”

Unhinged Responses by Pro Choicers to the Overturn of Roe V Wade

Unhinged Responses by Pro Choicers to the Overturn of Roe V Wade

There is now a PART TWO because this post was getting pretty long.


This post likely will be continued to be edited AFTER publication to add any new examples of pro-choice acts of violence or wacky behavior as they have their melt down over SCOTUS overturning Roe V. Wade


June 24, 2022

I just published a blog post about (Link): the overturn of Roe V Wade in the United States, which turns the status of abortion back to the States.

Since this decision has been made (well, even before then, when it was suspected this may happen), pro-abortionists have been violent and/or acting like bat shit insane wackos.

I’d like to use this thread to keep track of threats made against the Supreme Court Justices and so forth. Going forward, even days or weeks after this post is published, if any new violence or wacko reactions by pro-choicers occurs, I will edit this post to add those examples, if I have the time and energy.

If you’re a woman who doesn’t want to get pregnant: birth control is not 100% effective, but celibacy / sexual abstinence is always an option!

You do NOT need to have ‘penis in the vagina’ sex for any reason – you won’t die without it, and if the guy you’re dating doesn’t respect that, you can dump him, and you will be fine without him.

You will be fine SINGLE. You don’t need to be in a romantic relationship or having sex to be happy or find meaning, purpose, or companionship in life.

There’s nothing wrong with being a virgin until marriage or being celibate. If you choose to opt out of sex or dating for whatever reason, don’t let a guy you’re dating, our sex-obsessed culture, or hedonistic, sex-obsessed liberals, feminists, or progressives try to guilt trip you or shame you into engaging in behavior you do not want to or do not feel comfortable with.

It’s a fact of life, a biological truism, that only women can become pregnant. There are consequences to having sex, including becoming pregnant or contracting sexually transmitted infections.

No amount of being angry at SCOTUS for overturning Roe Vs. Wade will change that. You have to accept reality and take responsibility for your sexual choices in life.

I’ve seen various mental health professionals who specialize in narcissism who disagree with each other if narcissism is on the rise in the United States or not.

In my un-professional opinion (I do not work as a mental health professional), narcissism or narcissistic traits ARE on the rise in the USA and have been for years now,
which may help explain why people of whatever political persuasion behave like spoiled little brats now, whenever a court or organization makes a ruling or decision they do not like, so they feel fine fire bombing buildings, behaving like violent, obnoxious a-holes, and so on.

There is a staggering amount of entitlement in our culture now, where people lack self control if things don’t go the way they want them to.

Edit. Disclaimers, Caveats.

Unfortunately, since Roe V Wade was over-turned, I’ve seen a small number of conservative men online start bleating about how they think each woman should have ten kids apiece – no.

It’s not anyone’s place to lecture women on when, if, or how many children these men think these women “should” have.

While I do not support women getting abortions from pregnancies that were conceived via consensual sex, I also do NOT support conservatives, Christians, or anyone else, pressuring or shaming women into having any children, or making them feel guilty if they want to opt out of motherhood
– if women choose to sexually abstain, or to stay single (and not marry and have children), that is their right and their choice, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
If a woman wants to marry but also stay on birth control (marriage with no children), that is her choice as well, and that (Link): should be respected.

I’ve also seen screen grabs by others on Twitter from (Link): “incel” men thrilled in their Redditt or whatever groups that they are delighted that women who are sexually active, all of whom they refer to as “whores” are upset over the Roe Vs Wade ruling.

These Incel guys also need to shut up and stay out of it – these guys cannot even get a girlfriend or get a woman to have sex with them in the first place, so this doesn’t even impact them any how.

(Link): The Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade means that pro-life Christians now have a special responsibility

The Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade means that pro-life Christians now have a special responsibility

I’m fine with our culture “valuing motherhood,” but there is a problem with “over” valuing it too, which I’ve written of in other posts on my blog, such as (Link): this one and (Link): this one, among others:

(Link): (editorial): OPINION: Why Supreme Court abortion decision empowers women

The guy in this tweet is referring to Incel forums, where Incel men (who are bitter, lonely men who don’t know how to get dates or sex) are rejoicing that some women are upset that there are now limitations on abortion:

Examples Of Pro-Choice Outrage, Violence, or Weirdness re: Overturn of Roe V Wade 

(Some of these may not be in chronological order, but I began making this list on June 24, 2022 )

(Link – this blog): Pro-Abortion Women Strip to Underwear to Disrupt Joel Osteen Church Services

(Link – this blog): Pro-choice Abortion Activists Call for Mother’s Day Protests at Churches and Vandalize Churches

(Link – off site): Watch Live: Protests Erupt at Supreme Court After Abortion Case Ruling

(Link – off site): Prominent liberals are waging an insane insurrectionist war against the legitimacy of the Supreme Court because they’re mad Roe v. Wade got overturned

(Link – off site): Catholic and anti-abortion groups raise alarm about violence

(Link – off site): ATF investigating “suspicious” fire at Oregon pregnancy center

(Link): Anti-abortion Buffalo pregnancy center allegedly ‘firebombed’

Excerpts:

June 7, 2022
by David Propper

An anti-abortion Buffalo pregnancy center was allegedly “firebombed” overnight.

Police in Amherst, NY, confirmed an investigation is under way after a fire broke out at the CompassCare Community medical facility.

CompassCare leaders are blaming a pro-choice group for firebombing the office and said graffiti was scrawled on a wall that stated, “Jane Was Here.”

(Link – off site): ‘Revenge’: More Than 40 Attacks Against Pro-Life Centers as Violence Increases – June 23, 2022

Excerpts:

by C. Burke

From suspected arson to shattered windows, and graffiti — since the leak of a draft opinion suggesting the U.S. Supreme Court would overturn Roe v. Wade — more than 40 incidents of violence, vandalism, and intimidation against pro-life pregnancy centers have been reported.

“Our building was vandalized and our communication system was torn off our door only after some vulgar things happened on camera,” said Annabelle Rutledge, the national director of Young Women for America.

Continue reading “Unhinged Responses by Pro Choicers to the Overturn of Roe V Wade”

Transgender Male Who Was Born Female and ‘Had Sex With Three Women Using Specifically-Made Prosthetic Penis in the Dark After Meeting Them on Plenty of Fish’ Is Convicted of Assault

Transgender Male Who Was Born Female and ‘Had Sex With Three Women Using Specifically-Made Prosthetic Penis in the Dark After Meeting Them on Plenty of Fish’ Is Convicted of Assault

Somewhere on this blog is a post several years old that is very similar about another biological woman who pretended to be a man, she fooled several biological women into having sex with her (those women believed her to be a man), and she got jail time or slapped with a fine or whatever. I cannot find that post at this time.

(Link): Transgender male who was born female and ‘had sex with three women using specially-made prosthetic penis in the dark after meeting them on Plenty of Fish’ is convicted of assault

A transgender male had relationships with three women by using a specially made prosthetic penis in the dark to pretend to be born a man.

Tarjit Singh, 32, who was born a biological female named Hannah Walters, assaulted the victims between June 2010 and March 2016.

Singh would keep clothing on and have sex with the women with the strap-on phallus when the lights were turned off.

(Link): Tarjit Singh: Transgender man who tricked women into sexual relationships with fake penis is convicted

One victim only discovered the defendant had female genitalia after finding his strap-on prosthetic penis some months into their relationship.

by Tom Gillespie
May 25, 2022

A transgender man who tricked three women into sexual relationships by using a prosthetic penis has been convicted of assault by penetration.

Tarjit Singh, who was born a female named Hannah Walters but now identifies as a man, had abusive relationships with each of his three victims between June 2010 and March 2016.

During the course of the relationships, the 32-year-old would wear clothes during sex and use a prosthetic penis in the dark.

When the victims began to ask questions, Singh became abusive and manipulative and told one of them there was more to a relationship than sex and that she should learn to talk about her feelings more.

Singh was convicted of three counts of assault by penetration, six counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and one count of making a threat to kill following a trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court.

Continue reading “Transgender Male Who Was Born Female and ‘Had Sex With Three Women Using Specifically-Made Prosthetic Penis in the Dark After Meeting Them on Plenty of Fish’ Is Convicted of Assault”

Actor Ezra Miller, Leftist Identity Politics, Pronouns, and the SBC (Southern Baptists) – Priorities Out of Kilter

Actor Ezra Miller, Leftist Identity Politics, Pronouns, and the SBC (Southern Baptists) Actor Ezra Miller, Leftist Identity Politics, Pronouns, and the SBC (Southern Baptists) – Priorities Out of Kilter

This is sheer lunacy.

Movie actor Ezra Miller has been in trouble for grooming under-aged girls (one of them is now 18 years old), if you’re not aware.

If you’d like more background, you can Google the guy’s name, and here are a few links about it:

(Link): Authorities ‘cannot locate or serve’ Ezra Miller after the actor was accused of grooming a teen, report says

(Link): Ezra Miller taunts police, deletes social media accounts

A string of memes mocking police was the last thing The Flash’s star posted before deleting their Instagram account

(Link): A Protection Order Has Been Issued After Ezra Miller Allegedly Groomed A Teen, But Nobody Can Seem To Locate The Actor To Serve Them 

(Link): Actor Ezra Miller accused of ‘cult-like’ behavior, abuse of indigenous teen 

Progressives on Twitter, though, are currently more concerned that people commenting upon these news stories may not be referring to Miller by “preferred pronouns” of “they” or “them,” which are generally used to refer to groups of people, not an individual (aside from maybe situations where the biological sex of a person is not known, and then “they” is sometimes substituted).

Referring to a person as “he” is not “misgendering,” by the way. “Misgendering” involves acknowledging that there is such a thing as a gender binary (male and female) to start with, which most progressive kooks deny in the first place.

Miller is a biological male, so to call Miller a “she” would be a case of “misgendering.”

The pronoun “they” is not a gender term in and of itself, since it can refer to either a male or female but is usually a plural term used to denote a group of people of one or both (mixed) sexes present; the word is not in and of itself a reference to biological sex either way.

If Miller isn’t comfortable with acknowledging via language that he (yes, I said “he”) is biologically a man, that doesn’t change reality. Miller is still a biological man regardless of what one label slaps on to him. It’s pointless to chuck out perfectly good pronouns such as “he” and “him” that society already has in place.

The woke liberals are more concerned that people refer to Miller as “they” or “them” than they are that Miller is grooming under-aged girls.

Continue reading “Actor Ezra Miller, Leftist Identity Politics, Pronouns, and the SBC (Southern Baptists) – Priorities Out of Kilter”

Men Are Actually Blaming All Women for The Misogynic Progressive ‘Transwoman’ Lunacy – and not crediting feminists who’ve been speaking out on the issue for years – Men Like Rufo and Walsh Don’t Seem to Want to Share the Credit with Women

Men Are Actually Blaming All Women for The Misogynic Progressive ‘Transwoman’ Lunacy – and not crediting feminists who’ve been speaking out on the issue for years – Men Like Rufo and Walsh Don’t Seem to Want to Share the Credit with Women

I am a conservative. I am not a feminist.

I do not support the “woke” agenda, which would include things like denying the biological reality that there are two biological sexes, male and female.

I do not support men who “identify as women” (usually referred to as “transwomen”), especially if they have not undergone “bottom surgery,” being allowed into women’s only spaces, such as women’s prisons, bathrooms, and so forth.

Regardless if some of the wacko gender ideology we see today can be traced back to individual women writers of the 1990s or earlier (who were feminists), not all women can or should be blamed for that in particular, or for today’s out-of-control trans-activism.

Today’s trans activism insanity is, by and large, being carried along by MEN.

There are biological men with autogynephilia (a sexual fetish) and a large, first class case of Narcissism, who are hiding under the fig leaf of Gender Dysphoria to claim, “I’m a woman!,” and to also claim victim status and demand special rights.

That position is being helped along by male and female progressives.

But there are also biological women – of whatever political beliefs – who are opposed to biological men being allowed access into women’s only spaces, and some of them having been speaking out against trans activism going back years now.

And I have no idea what it matters if the numbers are more or less -ie, if there are more woman promoting trans activism or less.

No Studies, Polls, or Stats

One doofus or two who were arguing with me on Twitter earlier today (June 12) were blaming all women, women as a class, with no distinction, and saying the “numbers of women support trans activism outnumber those who speak out against it,” but neither individual cited me or linked me to any studies or polls (reputable or otherwise) to back up these assertions.

Based upon my anecdotal experience, I’ve seen a lot of biological women, and a few men, speaking out against progressive trans activism quite a bit the last few years – on twitter, on blogs, and in online magazine articles.

I’ve personally encountered very few biological women defending trans-insanity, and most of the women I’ve seen are opposed to progressive transgenderism, so I just tweeted back at one of those clowns,
“No, the women who are opposed to it outnumber those who support it.”

I’m sure some women who support leftist trans-activism may exist (there are progressive women (and men) crack pots who also support the quackery that is “anti racism” and “BLM,” after all), but I’ve seen far more speaking out against than in favor.

Some women have been speaking out against trans ideology for years, some for decades.

Ultimately, I’m not sure what difference it makes to argue that there may be more women supporting Trans Lunacy than oppose it… because it’s still unfair and inaccurate to blurt out, to suggest, that “women support it.” No, women are not a monolith on this subject.

As to the women who do oppose Trans Lunacy, some of them have been fighting it for years, before conservative men like Rufo and Walsh jumped on the band wagon.

Irreversible Damage by Abigail Shrier

One well known speaker and author against trans-insanity is a woman author, Abigail Shrier, who wrote a book about this issue, Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, in 2020, and it was banned from a Irreversible Damage Book Coverfew online book stores for awhile, if I recall correctly.

From a review of Shrier’s book on Psychology Today:

The book posits that a sudden surge in the number of teen girls identifying as trans boys is due not to gender dysphoria or transgenderism but rather to girls with other mental conditions who are mistakenly self-identifying as trans because there is social capital built into marginalized identities.
— end excerpts —

Carlson gave Shrier credit for being among the first to discuss this in the United States (show date; June 14, 2022), see the video in the tweet below:

Men Helped Usher In Trans Activism, Too!

In the United States, we have male Presidents (Obama and Biden), and Governors, (and likely some male Congressmen and Senators) who are pushing for bills or laws to allow biological males who identify as women to be allowed into women’s prisons, locker rooms, and so on.

A small sampling:

(Link):  California Dishing Out Condoms To Female Inmates After Democrat Newsom [who is a man] Forces Them To Live With Men By Gabe Kaminsky

(Link): 20 States Sue Biden Administration For Corrupting Title IX With ‘Gender Identity’ Mumbo Jumbo

(Link): Biden’s [Joe Biden, a man] Title IX Rewrite Could End Women’s Sports, Let Men In Locker Rooms 

(There are also a few male (Republican) governors, such as Stitt and De Santis who are pushing against trans ideology.
But we also have male Democrats, such as Joe Biden and others, futzing around on the definition of “woman” so as to make permissible biological males being legally permitted into women’s bathrooms, sports teams, etc.)

Post Modernism and Gender Ideology

Gender ideology is also part of post-modernism and today’s progressive love of neo-Marxism, which biological men helped to usher in.

Karl Marx, who got this bus rolling, was a man. Marx’s belief in group identity and putting everyone into oppressed classes undergirds a lot of today’s far left’s gender ideology and “woke” politics.

Do I then blame all men of today for the lunacy of progressivism, of the neo-Marxist group identity politics, or say, “men are to blame for Marxism”? No, I don’t. Because that wouldn’t be fair or accurate.

In the past 60 or so years, in the United States, there have been both male AND female authors, intellectuals, and pundits who have helped craft ideas that led to CRT, queer theory, and so on.

So I don’t appreciate the clowns I run into on Twitter blaming all women (women as a group) for the actions or views of SOME women, and for causes that are neither wholly attributed to one sex or the other, such as leftist trans-activism.

All Men: Michael Foucault, Pat Califia, Gayle Rubin, Alfred Kinsey, John Money, Erwin Gohrbandt

Feminist women who dabbled in Gender Ideology over 20 years ago were joined by progressive men who love Marxism, who were opposed to the idea of objective truth, who support group identity politics, and Queer Theory (which men (and some women) had a large hand in, such as Michel Foucault, Pat Califia, and Gayle Rubin – again, those are men).

Even Matt Walsh, in some of his videos and commentary about wacko, leftist Gender Ideology advocates, occasionally name drops MEN who have aided and abetted this queer theory, pro-trans-agenda world view, such as Alfred Kinsey and John Money.

According to the person(s) at this Twitter Account, a man is behind the design of the Transgender “pride” flag, and that man (biological man) is named flagTransPride - CopyRobert Hogge but goes by “Monica Helms.”

Then we have John Money. I believe Walsh has mentioned Dr. John Money a time or two.

(Link): Dr. John Money, Father Of Gender Theory, Was A Pedophilia Apologist

Excerpts:

Would it surprise you to know that the normalization of gender fluidity is rooted in the same ideology as Critical Race Theory? You won’t be surprised once you understand the whole story.
— end —

(Link): John Money: The Pro-Pedophile Pervert Who Invented “Gender”

(Link): John Money

Excerpts:

John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a New Zealand psychologist, sexologist and author known for his research into sexual identity and biology of gender.
He was controversial for his conduct towards vulnerable patients, including sexual abuse and endorsing conversion therapy aimed at young children.
He was one of the first researchers to publish theories on the influence of societal constructs of gender on individual formation of gender identity. Money introduced the terms gender identity, gender role and sexual orientation and popularised the term paraphilia.
He spent a considerable amount of his career in the United States.

Recent academic studies have criticized Money’s work in many respects, particularly in regard to his perpetration of the involuntary sex-reassignment of the child David Reimer,[3] his abuse of Reimer and his twin brother (also a child) by forcing them to simulate sex acts that Money photographed,[4] and the adult suicides of both brothers.[4]
— end excerpts —

So, some of the key influential figures leading us down the path to today’s current Trans Insanity are all men:
Michel Foucault, Pat Califia, Gayle Rubin, and John Money.

Continue reading “Men Are Actually Blaming All Women for The Misogynic Progressive ‘Transwoman’ Lunacy – and not crediting feminists who’ve been speaking out on the issue for years – Men Like Rufo and Walsh Don’t Seem to Want to Share the Credit with Women”