Why Progressive Christians Are Ineffective and Unpersuasive by P. Heck
I agree with some of this guy’s points, but maybe not all.
He mentions Rachel Held Evans in his post – I think she’s right, for the most part, in her opposition to gender complementarianism, but I think she’s incorrect on other topics.
I have several more things to say below this link and long excerpt:
(Link): Why Progressive Christians Are Ineffective and Unpersuasive by P Heck
… There is a reason that liberal Christian movements like those championed by Jim Wallis, Rachel Held Evans, Shane Claiborne and others are so ineffective and unpersuasive in American culture.
Rather than seeking to glorify and build the Kingdom of God, they regularly appropriate the language of Scripture to advocate for earthly, largely political causes that never address the principal need of humanity: redemption from sin.