In ‘Rift,’ Author Cait West Talks Breaking Free from Christian Patriarchy – ”You Will Be A Child Until You Get Married” – by K. Post

In ‘Rift,’ Author Cait West Talks Breaking Free from Christian Patriarchy – ”You Will Be A Child Until You Get Married” – by K. Post

I will put some of my comments below this excerpt, because I have several points in this interview that resonated with me:

(Link): In ‘Rift,’ Author Cait West Talks Breaking Free from Christian Patriarchy

Excerpts:

by K. Post
April 24, 2024

[The interview is with a woman named Cait West who wrote a book called RIFT about growing up as a “stay at home daughter,” where she was brought up under gender complementarian teachings, and her father controlled who, when, and if she dated, and this started a string of events where she began questioning the truth of the Christian faith or of God’s existence]

When Cait West got on a plane and left behind the Christian patriarchy movement at age 25, she hoped for a clean break. …

[Interviewer Question]:
“What do you mean when you refer to the Christian patriarchy movement?

[Answer]:
The Christian patriarchy movement was in full force in the ’90s and the early 2000s. It’s related to Quiverfull ideology — Bill Gothard, Vision Forum, the Duggars. And it’s very connected through the homeschooling community. God is the ultimate patriarch, and men are his representatives on Earth. The wife submits to him, and children submit to their parents.

Growing up, I was told I would become a wife and a mother. All my education was pointed toward how to help my future husband, and when I turned 18, I wasn’t allowed to go to college.
I couldn’t get a real job outside of the home and I couldn’t go on dates.
I was told I would be a child until I got married.
I didn’t have a driver’s license or any access to the outside world. I couldn’t decide what my future would look like.
I had to follow my dad’s rules for courtship and wait for him to find me a husband. That’s why they called me a stay-at-home daughter.

Continue reading “In ‘Rift,’ Author Cait West Talks Breaking Free from Christian Patriarchy – ”You Will Be A Child Until You Get Married” – by K. Post”

Can American Congregations Learn To Embrace The Uncoupled? by E. E. Evans

Can American Congregations Learn To Embrace The Uncoupled? by E. E. Evans

One or two points I’ve made at this blog going back years, is that churches are so obsessed with married parenthood, that even if you are currently married with children, if your children die, or if they age and move out of the house, your church will not be as welcoming to you, because you no longer have young children at home.

If your spouse dies, your church will have no use for you, and the remaining married couples will no longer hang out with you; they will view you as a potential threat and “marriage wrecker,” and they will practice the “Billy Graham Rule,” so married persons at the church will shy away from you, refuse to be seen alone with you, lest other members just assume you two are having an affair.

If you’re a married person, your spouse may die young, your spouse may develop dementia, and you will go from partners to care taker and patient, or, your spouse may divorce you – you need to develop friendships outside of your marriage.

Churches will not help you out in that area – they view all single adults, whether you are never married, widowed, or divorced, as being threats; they won’t want to be seen with you or invite you out anymore.

(Link): Can American Congregations Learn To Embrace The Uncoupled?

Excerpts:

by Elizabeth E. Evans

[The article discusses what I’ve been blogging about here for ten or more years: the number of single adults is growing, more adults are either opting out of marriage or delaying age of first marriage – and yet many churches either ignore singles to fixate on married with children couples, or they shame single, childless adults for being single, childless, which will not make more marriages happen.
The article also mentions that churches continue to face declining memberships, but many churches try to off-set the loss by appealing to young, nuclear families]

… The emphasis on family ministry, however, is stuck in the demographics of midcentury America, when houses of worship were thriving. “The church model that worked in 1960 doesn’t work anymore,” said Peter McGraw, a professor of marketing and psychology at the University of Colorado at Boulder and author of the recently published “Solo.”

In an environment where churches are hoping to attract and retain members, McGraw argues, “Why do anything that marginalizes a large group of your congregation?”

…That includes, he suggests, not only creating inclusive congregational groups, but details like making sure that promotional materials such as emails and newsletters target everyone.

Evangelical churches seem to be the most dedicated to pursuing families as members — or creating families out of their unpaired members.

… Younger singles aren’t the only ones looking to be included. Lindy Dimeo, 68, a retired crisis pregnancy center director, is a member of Blue Ridge Community Church, a small evangelical church near Charlottesville, Virginia. Dimeo and her husband played in the worship band together, but after he died, she took a few months off. “At the time it was hard living a single life in a family-oriented culture.”

Continue reading “Can American Congregations Learn To Embrace The Uncoupled? by E. E. Evans”

Book Review: The Struggle to Stay: Why Single Evangelical Women Are Leaving the Church – Review of Gaddini Book by E. Feyas

Book Review: The Struggle to Stay: Why Single Evangelical Women Are Leaving the Church – Review of Gaddini Book by E. Feyas

This author says she “left the faith” in a podcast interview she gave (that podcast is on You Tube – it is linked to and embedded further below).

The author, when asked by the atheist interviewer, which Christians are giving, in her opinion, good sexual advice to Christians today, she unfortunately cites perverted Christian personality Nadia Bolz Weber, who you can read about here.  Nadia Bolz Weber would be the last person I’d go to for sex advice if I wanted sex advice.

Not that most conservative Christians are any better on some sexual topics, but, two wrongs don’t make a right. Many conservatives and many liberals and progressives are wrong about many a thing.

The author explains in the book and the podcast that single, Christian women are leaving the church “faster than ever before.” Some are leaving the faith for agnosticism or atheism, while others remain Christian but stop attending church.

This book was released a year or more ago, and I already made at least one blog post about it around a year ago (that other post is linked to below, under “Related Posts”)

(Link): Book Review: The Struggle to Stay: Why Single Evangelical Women Are Leaving the Church

Feb. 2024
by Emma Feyas

Combining deep ethnographic research with personal experience and cultural realities, Katie Gaddini tells relatable stories and asks difficult questions. Her research seeks to understand not merely why single women might leave the evangelical church, but what exactly makes them stay.

Walking alongside four women—Carys, Jo, Maddie, and Liv—who move from deep commitment and service to evangelical congregations to “Christian-ish,” Gaddini’s narration provides an empathetic window into the reality of evangelical women, especially single evangelical feminist women.

Gaddini’s objective to “expose the costs of being an evangelical woman” is successful in three distinct ways. …

In between the narratives of each of the women in the study, Gaddini explains evangelical norms and cultures for readers who may be unfamiliar. White, mid-upper-class evangelicalism provides the boundaries for the study.

Continue reading “Book Review: The Struggle to Stay: Why Single Evangelical Women Are Leaving the Church – Review of Gaddini Book by E. Feyas”

The Cruelty of Natalism – “A student asked if infertility is nature’s way of saying we have no value” – by A. Maier (Re: CNBC: Childless Not by Choice)

The Cruelty of Natalism – “A student asked if infertility is nature’s way of saying we have no value” – by A. Maier

As for me personally, I didn’t care strongly if I ever had children or not; I was only willing to have children if I could have them by the age of 35. Even if I had married by age 36, I was not willing to have children at that point – so I don’t fit neatly into any one group, not Childfree, not the CNBC. I don’t think I’m infertile.

Where this author asks everyone to check their “natalistic” impulses – such as, don’t make every conversation about babies and children, don’t assume everyone you meet has or wants to have children – I’d say the same rule should apply to marriage vs. singleness, especially in conservative and Christian contexts and venues.

Are you a Christian preacher who always or often uses  marriage and married couples as examples in your sermons (if so, stop doing that)?
Are you assuming everyone in your congregation wants to be married (because some of them do not want to be – some single adults are happy being single and have no intention of marrying)?
Are you assuming everyone who is single is single because they hate marriage, men, or place career above seeking marriage (not true; plenty of single Christian women want to be married but are unable to find a suitable partner because churches lack men their age and “Christian” men on dating apps are jerks or perverts)?

Stop being so marriage-centric, because doing so alienates single adults, turns them off, and they may stop coming to church.
Some single adults may find marriage-centric behavior and sermons (from pastors, church people, friends and family) rude, hurtful, and off putting. So knock it off.

(Link): The Cruelty of Natalism – “A student asked if infertility is nature’s way of saying we have no value.”

Excerpts:

KEY POINTS

    • People without children may struggle to survive in a natalist world.
    • Natalism can render individuals without children invisible.
    • Natalism holds no space for those without children.

Ashley Maier, MSW, MPA
June 19, 2023

I am childless not by choice. That’s not easy in a natalist world.

Never heard of either of those terms? Well, you have now.

Childless Not by Choice
The growing childless not by choice (CNBC) community is probably the largest group you’ve never heard of. Just go to Instagram, search any version of that label or acronym, and there we are.

CNBC means just what it says: It describes individuals who don’t have children and that wasn’t their choice. It doesn’t mean that everyone who is CNBC has experienced infertility, but a lot have. It doesn’t mean that everyone who is CNBC has undergone fertility treatments, but a lot have.

Natalism
Whether by choice or not by choice, not having children in a natalist society is nearly impossible to navigate. There just isn’t room for us.

Natalism is, essentially, the promotion of childbearing. It’s when having children is the norm. Don’t have kids? You’re not normal. Welcome to life in the U.S. and most other countries.

Continue reading “The Cruelty of Natalism – “A student asked if infertility is nature’s way of saying we have no value” – by A. Maier (Re: CNBC: Childless Not by Choice)”

Conservative (Christian?) Not The Bee Account Blocked Me On X – For Pointing Out They’re Marriage and Parenthood Idolizers and Hypocritical about Sexual Mores, Singleness, Childlessness

Conservative (Christian?) “Not The Bee” Account Blocked Me On X – For Pointing Out They’re Marriage and Parenthood Idolizers and Hypocritical about Sexual Mores, Singleness, Childlessness

Sometime the evening of January 28, 2023, the clowns at “Not The Bee” blocked me!

The Not the Bee account blocked me over this post on X (Twitter), and I put a screen cap of it here below (I will resume commentary about this situation below the screen capture):

notBee_tweet_PlannedParenthood

I recently published a blog post about how yes, Planned Parenthood is wrong to publish anti-virginity content as they’ve done before,
but I pointed out to various conservatives who posted against it on “X” that they’re often the VERY SAME conservatives who insult or scold single, childless adults for being single and childless.
(That post is here: (Link): Planned Parenthood Hammered After Sharing Video Redefining Sex Act as Whatever ‘You’ Want It To Be)

Which is rather hypocritical.

You can’t (if you want to be consistent) simultaneously support virginity for teens and young adults…
but then turn around and criticize those same adults for still being a single virgin (hence no children) years later – when they’re age 30+ and still not married with children –
but that is exactly what hyper-pro-marriage/parenthood types like Matt Walsh, Lyman Stone, Al Mohler, Eric Conn, and accounts like “Not the Bee” do.
(That is also what marriage- and motherhood-idolizing Southern Baptists have done for years; I wrote a little bit about it in this post.)

Before I continue, I should state that I am a conservative.
I am not a liberal nor a progressive. 

I am also not opposed to marriage, parenthood, or the nuclear family, but I’ve noticed for years now that too many other conservatives, especially religious ones, have turned marriage, parenthood, and the nuclear family into Golden Calves that they worship. compsWorshipGoldenCalfMeme

Such conservatives go far, far beyond what the Bible teaches about marriage, parenthood and family, to turn all three into idols, then they frequently lash out and shame any adult who is over age 25 or so who is still single (whether by choice or by circumstance), and they mock any adult (single or married) who does not have children.

Jesus speaking:

“Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. (Matthew 10:37)

That is quite the odd thing for Jesus to say if Jesus – being God in the flesh – was nearly as “pro Nuclear Family” and into singles-shaming as are the average conservatives of today.

The fact that a minority of people on the far left may make anti-nuclear family (or anti-parenthood) commentary does not mean the correct way, wisest way, or most advantageous way, of dealing with such rhetoric, is to bash, shame, and insult adults for being single and childless.

Continue reading “Conservative (Christian?) Not The Bee Account Blocked Me On X – For Pointing Out They’re Marriage and Parenthood Idolizers and Hypocritical about Sexual Mores, Singleness, Childlessness”

Why Is the Pundit Class Suddenly So Marriage-Obsessed? by J. Weiss

Why Is the Pundit Class Suddenly So Marriage-Obsessed? by J. Weiss

Ew, they actually included marriage-worshipping, singles-shaming Brad Wilcox (of National Marriage Project) for this.

I’m a life long conservative, I don’t agree with liberals on many topics, and I sure don’t agree with the far left on much of anything, but I found myself agreeing with one or two of the left of center types in this piece more than I did the conservative, excessively pro marriage types, like Wilcox.

I tend to view the topic of marriage from a realist perspective, not so much a “left” (liberal or progressive) or “right” (conservative) vantage. I think too many conservatives pin unrealistic hopes and expectations on marriage (as well as parenthood and the nuclear family).

I think conservatives want marriage (and parenthood and the nuclear family) to do things it’s incapable of doing. I think many conservatives make much more out of marriage than God Himself does!

Some of these conservatives continue to make the mistaken assumptions that women aren’t marrying because they’re “career obsessed” and are choosing career over marriage (not so), or that they hate marriage (not true).

These types of conservatives continually overlook the fact that many conservative women, such as myself, had hoped and expected to marry, but we get past the age of 35 and we never met the right person.

(The “equally yoked” rule unnecessarily keeps a lot of Christian single women single far longer than they’d like. Many churches and denominations have far more single women than single men, and the gender imbalance plays a role, too.)

I do like where Bruenig mentions that there’s a difference between high quality and low quality marriages because this point is often neglected by pro-marriage conservatives.
Too often, a lot of hyper- pro- marriage conservatives hold this faulty assumption that all marriages are equally wonderful, loving, and healthy. The reality is, a lot of people end up marrying selfish, abusive, irresponsible, or neglectful spouses.

Not everyone who marries gets married to a person who is loving, kind, reliable, and responsible. Marriage is not always a happy-clappy fairy tale filled with Rainbows, Glitter, and Unicorns.

One of the pro-marriage (conservative) persons says she’s choosing to view marriage as a societal entity and not something for individuals – of course. And that is kind of the wrong view to take about marriage, especially when you’re upset that more people are not marrying.

My fellow conservatives often fail to take each individual’s situation into account. A lot of them fail to realize (or care?) that many women desire marriage but are unable to find a suitable partner.

They instead often write social media posts or magazine articles assuming that women are intentionally avoiding marriage, so they shame and insult single women for being single.

(By the way, in some nations other than the U.S.A., where marriage is also on the decline, some women are deliberately choosing to opt out of marriage, because in those other cultures, marriage does not benefit the women. So I do not blame or criticize women who intentionally decide not to marry if they realize that the institution will harm them and not benefit them.)

The one conservative lady, Hymowitz, victim- blames one lady who was mentioned in an essay about how difficult dating is for women these days, a lady who was involved with a man who was addicted to drugs and the guy walked out on her; they broke up. Hymowitz criticizes the lady in question for dating such a poor quality man.

There is so much I could say here, but I don’t want to write a 70 page essay about why some people end up with bad partners.

To summarize, I will say, it’s not always fair or compassionate to blame women (or to blame men) for marrying abusers or drug addicts, for one reason of several, a lot of addicts or abusers hide their problems until after they move in with, or marry, their partner, and the partner ends up being blind-sided.

By the time the partner can see the addiction or abuse, they may be “trapped” in the relationship and not have the courage or finances to leave.

Why women (or men) end up dating or married to abusers or addicts is another topic for another blog post (it can involve, but is not limited to, issues like personality disorders, unresolved childhood trauma, unhealed codependency, and many other factors),
but in the meantime, I think it’s kind of unfair, unwarranted, and ignorant to issue a blanket statement or attitude unilaterally blaming people who end up living with or married to a jerk, so they break things off.

Why some people end up with, or are attracted to, toxic people is a complicated subject that would take pages to discuss, but suffice it to say, it can be unfair and uncharitable to blame people who do end up dating or married to jerks.

Most people who end up dating or married to poor quality persons (who they sometimes later divorce or break up with) didn’t wake up one morning and say, “You know what? I want to knowingly and deliberately date and marry a drug addict or an abuser!”
That’s not how it works.

(Link): Why Is the Pundit Class Suddenly So Marriage-Obsessed?

Excerpts:

We convened a roundtable of experts on the history of marriage to talk about why it’s becoming so politically charged.

by Joanna Weiss
January 6, 2024

Marriage, at least in the U.S., isn’t what it used to be. Over the past 50 years, marriage rates nationwide declined by 60 percent. Forty percent of U.S. children are now born to unmarried mothers, twice as many as in 1980. One widely covered poll last year found that 2 out of 5 GenZ-ers and millennials consider marriage an outdated concept.

Such stats have inspired a volley of columns, blog posts, think pieces and books, arguing why we should (or shouldn’t) care. The decline of marriage, after all, joins other social changes such as falling birth rates and a “loneliness epidemic” — the new crusade of Surgeon General Vivek Murthy — that arguably could be solved by more marriage. So conservatives, broadly, have preached a return to tradition: In the New York Times, David Brooks advised younger readers “to obsess less about your career and to think a lot more about marriage.”

Liberals, meanwhile, have often argued that society’s problems are too deep to be fixed with a wedding band: In New York Magazine, (Link): Rebecca Traister pushed back against scholars and politicians who “have routinely imposed marriage — as if it were a smooth, indistinct entity — as a cure for the inequity, dissatisfaction, and loneliness that plague this nation.”

But opinions haven’t always shaken down along the usual partisan lines. University of Maryland economics professor Melissa Kearney made the case for marriage to her fellow liberals in her widely discussed book The Two-Parent Privilege: How Americans Stopped Getting Married and Started Falling Behind.
“This is still so wrenching to discuss,” wrote Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, in a column that essentially agreed with Kearney’s point that liberals should be concerned about the collapse of the traditional family.

Why is the marriage conversation so challenging? Maybe because it touches on economic policy, racial history, the culture wars, the long-term effects of the feminist revolution and the intimate contours of everyday life.
POLITICO Magazine wanted to explore all of those dynamics with a group of marriage experts, advocates and thinkers who had different perspectives and politics. So we invited them to a Zoom session to hash it out.

Matt Bruenig is a blogger and president of the left-leaning think tank People’s Policy Project. Stephanie Coontz is director of research and education for the Council on Contemporary Families and the author of several books about gender and the family, including Marriage, A History: How Love Conquered Marriage.
Kay Hymowitz is a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, and the author of Marriage and Caste in America: Separate and Unequal Families in a Post-Marital Age.
Brad Wilcox is a professor of sociology at the University of Virginia and the author of the forthcoming book, Get Married: Why Americans Must Defy the Elites, Forge Strong Families, and Save Civilization, due out in February.
Deadric Williams is a professor of sociology at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville who studies race and family structure.

They spent more than an hour in a conversation, moderated by contributing writer Joanna Weiss. They debated the real sources of these concerns about marriage, whether the institution itself has “magical” properties for raising children and if properly supported families of any variety can offer the same advantages.

The following conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.


Joanna Weiss: I want to start with you, Stephanie, since you’re the marriage historian. Over the past couple of centuries, marriage has evolved from pretty purely an economic institution to a social institution, a cultural institution, a theoretical joining of soulmates with all that implies. How has it changed in the U.S. in the last 50 years, and in the last 10 years?

Stephanie Coontz: Marriage used to be the only game in town. You could not get access to legal rights without marriage. Most women could not support themselves outside of marriage.

Most men could not work a full-time job and get their meals made and their house cleaned, and any children they had raised outside of marriage were not protected.

[Harvard historian] Nancy Cott once made a really interesting analogy: What we saw over the last 100 years is the disestablishment of marriage as an institution, the same way we saw the disestablishment of the Church of England.

Some of the decline in marriage is absolutely inevitable, completely irreversible. Some, however, is occurring because it’s harder and harder to build a marriage, and many marriages that people can enter don’t look like they’re going to deliver the goods and the solace that we expect.

Matt Bruenig: I don’t know that I have prepared a case, exactly. There are sometimes very incomplete and, frankly, lazy arguments that people make about marriage, where they don’t distinguish between high-quality marriages and low-quality marriages, and that can generate a lot of mistaken policy conclusions. That’s what I’ve mostly been writing about with respect to Melissa Kearney’s book.

As far as my stance on marriage in general: We live in a pluralistic society. Let a thousand flowers bloom on different approaches to life.

Continue reading “Why Is the Pundit Class Suddenly So Marriage-Obsessed? by J. Weiss”

College Chaplin Under Fire for Trying to Organize BDSM Workshop with Dominatrix for Students – Conservatives Rightly Upset About This, But They Also Hypocritically Criticize Women for Being Single and Celibate

College Chaplin Under Fire for Trying to Organize BDSM Workshop with Dominatrix for Students – Conservatives Rightly Upset About This, But They Also Hypocritically Criticize Women for Being Single and Celibate

A few words upfront before I give the link and excepts from the article.

I’m old enough to remember when people on the left screamed and yelled around three decades ago that what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms should be tolerated, it was nobody’s business, and stay out of their bedrooms.

However, these days, they demand that everyone else in society put up with their public expressions of sexuality – either hearing about their progressive sexual habits and behaviors in classrooms, or, they parade them in public on streets in parades. And the rest of us are expected not only to be exposed to their garbage, but we’re expected to publicly affirm it and celebrate it, too – not just “tolerate” it.

Says one doofus interviewed in this piece who supports this BDSM workshop: “By every sense of the meaning in the law — everything — they’re adults. Adults engage in sexual acts…”
– speak for yourself. Some adults are celibate.

(❇️ What I say next I may copy and paste into a future post or two, because it’s very pertinent to about two anti-singleness essays I’ve seen published in the last few months by marriage-worshipping Christians.
So, if you are a regular visitor to this blog, you may be seeing the following content below again in the future a time or two.)

This article says some conservatives are upset about this workshop, and I don’t blame them for that (especially considering it’s being organized by a Chaplin, who should be among the last to endorse perversion), but, I note that celibate single adults such as myself get smeared and shamed by the same conservatives for not being married and a mother!

My fellow conservatives: you can’t have it both ways!
You cannot hypocritically object to single adults fornicating and participating in or supporting pornographic or deviant behaviors while simultaneously so idolizing marriage and motherhood that you end up periodically tweeting or writing articles that criticize singleness (especially lifelong singleness or singleness past the age of 29) as you do.

You cannot fairly and realistically set parameters in such a way (and that are not taught in the Bible) to define a life well lived, or best lived, to mean only, “an adult should marry by age 25 and already have three or more children by that point,” because it’s not feasible – even people who wanted to marry, such as myself, were unable to.

I am never-married into my 50s not due to lack of desire but due to lack of men to date. None of the churches I attended over my life had men in my age range; they were either too old, already married, or, usually, there were far more single women in attendance than men.

It’s cruel, unfair, unrealistic, incredibly patronizing and insulting, and unbiblical, to run around publishing in essays, or telling never married middle aged (or older) adults, such as myself, that singleness is not good, marriage is the norm, marriage is good (portrayed as in, ‘better than singleness’ or ‘singleness is not as good as marriage’), and singleness equates to misery or a second-tier life.  (In which case, you’re also saying that the life of Jesus of Nazareth was second-tier, second best, faulty, and lacking in some way.)

Contrary to a lot of recent pro-marriage dreck I’ve seen online by Christian conservatives, the Bible does not teach that “marriage is the norm,” or that God even intended for it to be so; that the Bible mentions a lot of married people just means a lot of people thousands of years ago used to get married – but nowhere, not even Genesis, does it state, “marriage is the norm.”

Sorry, but God saying “it is not good for man to be alone” from Genesis is not the same thing as saying, “Marriage should be the norm! I, God, insist most adults should be married!” – though that is how many excessively pro-marriage Christians like to distort such passages – the Bible nowhere teaches that or states it.

It’s a view that is assumed and read into the Bible because you hyper-marriage Christians so very badly want to believe that is God’s view of marriage and singleness, and that is how God designed marriage – but it remains eisegesis (your assumptions read into the text, but the text itself does not teach what you say it’s teaching about the purpose of marriage or God’s intent for marriage and singleness, etc).

Further, by New Testament times, Jesus of Nazareth taught the “not good to be alone” issue could be eradicated via church community. That is, Jesus taught that other believers in Jesus are your brothers, sisters, sons, fathers, mothers, and daughters, and so, a never married, divorced, or widowed adult could and can get their companionship needs met via friendship with other Christians – not only through a spouse.

Does this Chaplin support celibate adults on her campus? What type of workshops does she offer for celibates? Or, like most deviant progressives and pro-marriage conservatives, does she wrongly assume all adults are fornicating?

By the way, our culture has been over-sexualized the last few decades, in particular the last few years. Maybe that’s one reason why Gen Z doesn’t want to see sex and romance in movies and TV shows anymore, and I don’t blame them.

There are other things in life besides sex, dating, marriage, and romance. There are other enjoyable pursuits in life that have nothing to do with sex, dating, marriage, and romance.

To quote The Thompson Twins on that point: “true romance is just another slice of the cake” – it’s not the whole cake. And if you’re a single adult who had hoped for marriage but it didn’t come to pass, there are other pieces of the cake for you to try – pieces that have nothing to do with marriage, sex, dating, or romance. And you can find happiness, joy, meaning, and purpose through those other pursuits. It’s up to you to figure out what that looks like for you.

Maybe it’s volunteer work, or taking up guitar lessons, or writing poetry.

But happiness, meaning, etc, is not confined only to marriage, dating, sex, and romance – and the Bible sure does not teach that happiness, meaning, and etc, are limited to, or to be found only in, marriage, sex, dating, and romance.

(Link): College chaplain under fire for trying to organize BDSM workshop with dominatrix for students

Nov 17, 2023
By Yaron Steinbuch

A Tennessee college chaplain tried to organize a “BDSM 101” workshop for students featuring a local dominatrix to discuss how to safely engage in the sexual practice — but the school quickly pulled the plug on it.

Students at Rhodes College in Memphis received the surprise invitation earlier this month about the workshop hosted by the Rev. Beatrix Weil, an ordained minister and school chaplain since 2018, Fox 13 reported.

“Chaplain Beatrix will host a local dominatrix to share wisdom on how to safely, sanely and consensually learn about bondage, discipline-domination, sadism-submission and masochism,” it reads, according to the outlet.

Continue reading “College Chaplin Under Fire for Trying to Organize BDSM Workshop with Dominatrix for Students – Conservatives Rightly Upset About This, But They Also Hypocritically Criticize Women for Being Single and Celibate”

Study Reveals the Twisted Way Incels View Dating – and Why They Have Little Success (Conservatives, With Their Recurrent, Abhorrent Singles- Shaming Commentary are Exacerbating This Problem)

Study Reveals the Twisted Way Incels View Dating – and Why They Have Little Success (Conservatives, With Their Recurrent, Abhorrent Singles- Shaming Commentary are Exacerbating This Problem)

A few comments by me before I copy the links and excerpts in below:

External Locus Of Control – Not Taking Personal Responsibility

One of the comments from the article below that really grabbed my attention was this one:

Results showed that the incel group was more likely than the other to attribute their singlehood to external reasons, such as the competition posed by other men.
— end excerpts —

If you make your locus of control external to yourself, as many personality disordered people do, and as people with codependency do, you will never be happy, and you’ll have very little success in life. You’re setting yourself up for failure.

If you want to find inner peace and encounter more success in life, you have to make your locus of control internal.

This doesn’t mean you cannot acknowledge how the past, or people of your past, negatively impacted you or hurt you, but – you have to still get up, brush off the dirt, and make a deliberate choice to move forward and keep trying.

If you sit around constantly focused on how life has done you wrong, how life has been unfair to you, or over how the people from your past abused you, exploited you, or let you down, you’re not moving forward.
You cannot simultaneously live in the present and make strides in the future if your mind is constantly ruminating on the past.

If you keep blaming other people, you’re not taking control of your own life, your own choices, and your own happiness; you are not making any type of attitude changes, or other changes in your life, that will tilt things to your favor.

During the 35+ years I was extremely codependent (and I also had clinical depression until my mid-40s), I kept attracting a lot of acquaintances and friends who had clinical depression, negative attitudes, and many had Covert Narcissistic traits (ie, they had huge victim-hood mentalities).

In over 20 years on the internet, in participating on forums, blogs, and social media, I’ve attracted the same types of people (until I dropped the codependency).

I wrote long blog posts about some of these people (such as here), and one trait of several I noticed all these people had in common was a victimhood mentality – these types of people waste a lot of time and energy re-hashing past wrongs, how everyone has hurt them, how God let them down, and how life didn’t work out like they planned.
They blame all their misfortune on factors external to themselves – which means, they’re not taking back control by taking responsibility for their choices and actions.

So long as you stay mired in that victim mindset – instead of accepting the pain of your past, grieving it, and determining to move forward – you’re making yourself miserable, and you may even be causing yourself to have depression, or, you may be causing yourself to remain “stuck” in depression.

That’s right.
All the people who hurt you previously, all the people who refused to date you (whatever or whomever you’re upset about) are not currently holding you down – you are.

The only person standing in your way now is you. Not someone who mistreated you when you were a child, or someone from 15 years ago, or all the women (or men) who didn’t date you.

If you’re having a hard time working through past hurts (i.e., you were badly abused or neglected in childhood), you may have C-PTSD or CEN (Childhood Emotional Neglect), and you need to see a trauma-informed therapist to help you recover. You need some kind of professional mental health help to take back responsibility for your life now.

Traits of Personality Disorders

Unfortunately, if you’re someone with a personality disorder – such as Vulnerable (also known as Covert) Narcissism, there is no cure for that. And it sounds to me like a lot of the traits incels are said to have (according to this study) belong to people with Cluster B disorders, particularly, Covert Narcissism.

Paranoia, pathological insecurity, anxiety, and fear of rejection are traits that are often found in persons with Covert Narcissism and/or BPD (Borderline Personality Disorder), and the study says those are common traits in Incels.
Covert Narcissism is not generally treatable, but BPD is.
Sounds to me like a lot of these Incel men have psychological problems, many of which cannot be cured or healed.

Singles Shaming – Which Conservatives Engage in Often – May Be Contributing to the Problem

Another possible contributing factor in making this Incel problem worse:
The culture at large – in particular my fellow conservatives who have unbelievably moved into turning marriage and parenthood into idols they worship – need to send the message to everyone that there is nothing shameful, wrong, or bad about being single or being a virgin past age 18 or in being celibate.

The study says that one driving factor behind negative mental health or violence of Incels is a sense of shame over being single, and that these Incels wrap up a lot of their identity in their lack of a romantic partner. 

My fellow conservatives tend to spend a lot of time, every few months, shaming and insulting single and childless adults for being single and childless.
I think that conservatives (who worship the Nuclear Family, motherhood, and marriage) are contributing to the Incel phenomenon because of this.
Conservatives incorrectly encourage adults (women particularly) to wrap their entire identity and purpose in life in marrying and becoming a mother.

Here is some of what my fellow conservatives should be saying to single men and women:

If you want to be married or dating but are not having success at it, that can be very frustrating, disappointing, and lonely. I acknowledge that.

It’s not wrong to want to have a significant other or to marry, but if it doesn’t come to pass, you need to actively accept that is your situation instead of sitting around in perpetual resentment, rage, or shame about it.

Allow yourself to grieve your single status if you find it upsetting, allow yourself to feel the loss, but make a choice, after you permit yourself some time to grieve it,  to enjoy your life as it is,
rather than sit around often ruminating on it, dwelling on it, feeling infuriated about it, or joining online forums of other angry singles who are angry and bitter about being single.

Instead of sitting around all day focusing on what you do not have (a girlfriend or boyfriend), find other interests in your life, and go after those.

That doesn’t mean you cannot occasionally try to date, but your entire life should not be wrapped up in finding a boyfriend or a girlfriend, or in feeling ashamed that you do not have one.

Platonic friendship can be wonderful.
You don’t have to get all your relational or emotional needs met through a wife or a girlfriend or through a husband or boyfriend.

I had wanted to be married, but it never happened (I was engaged in my 30s but I broke up with my fiance.)

I’m middle-aged now, I never did marry, and while I felt sad about that for a few years (up until my mid- 40s or so), I learned to enjoy my life as it is, not as how I planned or hoped it to be.

You too can achieve that, but you have to be willing to do it, rather than permitting yourself to cave in daily or weekly to the anger, disappointment, frustration, and disillusionment.

Acceptance is key, too. We don’t always get everything we want in life or had hoped to have. Make peace with that.

Some Single Women Who Want to Date Are Not Primarily Or Only Interested in Looks or Money

One part of this study says that these Incels think that women are primarily interested in looks and money – which is not altogether true. One of the top qualities I look for in a man is Kindness.

I do care about what a guy looks like, but like many women, I am willing to be flexible if the guy in question has other qualities I like. For me, personally, I don’t care about a lot of money.

When I tried to explain this to some embittered single men in a thread on X (formerly Twitter), they sat there and acted incredulous.

These men then tried to explain to me, what I, a single woman, finds attractive in a man – though I had just told them the traits I find appealing in men (and a lot of money was NOT on my list)!

These bitter single men are so very cynical, I don’t think they will ever get a girlfriend or a wife.
If you harbor THAT level of mistrust against any and every woman you meet, even ones online, you will continually fail at attracting women.

Don’t Build Your Entire Identity Around Having a Mate or Not Having One

Instead of forming your identity on being sadly single, choose to form it around something more positive and uplifting.

And again, my fellow conservatives CONTRIBUTE to the Incel problem by insisting that adults who are single should feel guilty, ashamed, and terrible about being single, that every adult should wrap his or her identity up in being a spouse and a parent – concepts that the Bible never endorses, teaches, or suggests.

I understand that one motivation of Conservatives in their shaming of singleness is to fight back against “anti nuclear family” views of the far left, but that does not excuse the behavior in the first place.

Other than that motivation, I’ve never understood why so many other conservatives hype marriage and parenthood as much as they do,
because if you wrap your entire worth and identity up in being a spouse or parent,
what will you do when and if your children and husband die young, your spouse divorces you, or your children grow older and move out?

For the benefit of your own mental health and flourishing, you need to form an identity that is not wholly wrapped up in being a husband, wife, mother, or father.

My fellow conservatives are completely in the wrong to encourage adults to build their entire identity around their relationship status.

(Link): First official study reveals what creates incels

Incels is the term used for a group of sexually embittered men who form their identities around their perceived inability to establish romantic connections with women.

(Link): How Incels Approach Dating

Excerpts:

Self-identified incels take the “grapes are sour” argument to its extreme.

October 2023
by Jourdan Travers LCSW
…The misogyny, hate speech, and, in some cases, real-world violence perpetrated by self-identified incels are alarming and appear primarily driven by hatred and distrust of women and a sense of feeling victimized by the feminist movement.

1. They rely on an external locus of control.

A 2023 study found that, in assigning a cause to their singlehood, men who self-identified as incels displayed a greater “external locus of control” than non-incel men, attributing life events and outcomes of one’s actions to external factors and perceiving their lives as being largely governed by forces beyond their control.
The researchers suggest that such external attribution may stem from social comparison, as incels often perceive themselves as having lower “value” as romantic or sexual partners than other men.

The study found that incels further placed excessive importance on physical attractiveness and financial prospects to attract women and underestimate their preferences for the qualities of intelligence, kindness, and humor. Incels’ inaccurate perceptions of what women desire in partnerships led to them blaming women as well as other men for their lack of romantic success.

…Incels also believe that highly desirable men, branded by the community as “Chads” or “Alpha males,” are winners of the genetic lottery for attractiveness, due to which a majority of women gravitate towards them, reducing others’ chances for a match.

Finally, incels believe that “subordinate” men, often referred to as “betas” or even “simps” make women believe they are more desirable than they actually are, so that they will choose them. Incels perceive themselves to be at the bottom of this three-tier hierarchy of desirability.

The researchers suggest that by viewing technology, women, or other men as the cause of their misery, incels avoid accountability for their actions or maladaptive coping mechanisms for rejection. By projecting their dating insecurities onto their external reality, they reinforce patriarchal values and dehumanize the women they seek to date, further reducing their chances of romantic success.

….A 2023 study published in The Journal of Sex Research examined online dating experiences of incels and non-incels, finding significant mental health differences between them. Incels scored higher than their counterparts on the following dimensions:

….Rejection sensitivity.
The self-identity of an incel is rooted in romantic rejection. The researchers found that they also experience high levels of rejection sensitivity, which refers to an individual’s heightened and often anxious response to the perceived possibility of rejection or social exclusion.
The study found that incels also reported a greater fear of being single. This creates a tendency to react strongly to situations that may involve social judgment, like dating often does.
It seems that in rejecting themselves and believing they will not be good enough for potential partners, incels believe everyone else will agree.
This may contribute to hostile behavior, making them more dismissive of others and resulting in an unfortunate self-fulfilling prophecy.

Lower self-esteem.
An incel’s self-esteem is highly influenced by their relationship status. The undesirable category they assign themselves to, as well as heightened levels of rejection sensitivity, could be contributing to their lower self-esteem as compared to non-incels because securing a relationship is essential to their confidence.

Insecure attachment style.
Incels tend to display insecure and avoidant attachment styles and this may be associated with their perception of women as manipulative or the narrative of them that suggests that they settle for rich “beta” men until they meet a “Chad.” Insecure attachment styles have also been linked to violent relationship behavior.

The researchers found that all of these symptoms in incel men were linked to believing they were less popular than others and suggested that incels’ anxiety around being single could make their dating experiences worse.

Inherent to extreme incel ideology is the attitude that women are inferior, make shallow choices, and are commodities men are entitled to. These ideas, rooted in toxic masculinity, perpetuate a harmful narrative for both incel men and non-incels.

(Link): Study reveals the twisted way incels view dating – and why they have so much less success

October 25, 2023

Incels – involuntary celibates – are men who form their identity around their perceived inability to have romantic relationships with women.

They make up a dark and depraved online community of young heterosexual men who blame society and women for their lack of success with intimacy.

Some commentators have suggested that one reason why incels fail in the dating world is because they judge women too highly, and are unrealistic about the caliber of potential partner they will attract.

However, the first official study into incel mating psychology has suggested this is not the case.

Researchers at the University of Texas found that self-confessed incels actually make fewer demands of potential female suitors than men who are not in the group.

Another interesting finding was that incels were more likely to be of shorter height. Studies show that women are more likely to be attracted to taller-than-average men,  which could contribute to the feeling of rejection that incels are known to harbor.

[Image caption on page:]
Being depressed, paranoid, anxious all make men more likely to become an incel, previous research from the University of Rome found.
Attachment styles causing clingy behavior and a fear of rejection are also predictors of a hatred towards women, they discovered

Continue reading “Study Reveals the Twisted Way Incels View Dating – and Why They Have Little Success (Conservatives, With Their Recurrent, Abhorrent Singles- Shaming Commentary are Exacerbating This Problem)”

Celebrity Says She Married Briefly Years Ago Because She Was Drunk and Bored – Yet Conservatives Berate Other Women for Having Good Reasons For Being Single Over 25

Celebrity Says She Married Briefly Years Ago Because She Was Drunk and Bored – Yet Conservatives Berate Other Women for Having Good Reasons For Being Single Over 25

In the overall scheme of things, I cannot tell you why I remain single into my 50s (I never married, in spite of being engaged when younger), but I can rattle off a few theories.

One reason of many that factored into my singleness, I suspect, is that I took marriage seriously. I was a one-time devout Christian, and to this day I remain a conservative (I am not a progressive, a liberal, nor a feminist).

I followed much of the Christian “how to get married” advice I was exposed to growing up – I was into the “equally yoked” rule for many years, a rule based upon a certain biblical interpretation which stipulates that Christians should only marry other Christians – and I prayed and trusted God to send me a spouse, etc etc etc. (I’m not going to rehash all the “how to get married” advice, as it would make this post too long).

I now realize how bogus “equally yoked” is as pertaining to dating and marriage, so I threw that interpretation into the trash can several years ago, much to the annoyance of several long-time Christian women who used to read this blog of mine regularly; one or two stomped off in a huff (they left me angry parting messages letting me know they’d no longer be visiting this blog).

I don’t believe in getting married just to get married, or because society, church, and idiotic, sexist, marriage-idolizing conservatives such as Al Mohler, Matt Walsh, Mark Driscoll, and Eric Conn, and many others, pressure, shame, guilt trip or try to fear-monger me into getting married.

I will not marry the first guy to come along, because ultimately, he and I may not be compatible (my fiance from years ago was not a good match for me – or for many women out there; he was incredibly self absorbed, treated his mother like his wife, and he was very financially irresponsible).

I will not marry out of greed or fear.
(From my research not just on singleness but on personality disorders, one thing I’ve learned is that a lot of people out there have a deep, pathological fear of being alone, so they will end up marrying the wrong person
– but in such cases, they usually divorce years later.
After divorcing, they discover being alone, living single, is preferable to being in a relationship (ie, marriage) with someone who is abusive, selfish, or negligent).

I wanted to get married to the right person and have that marriage last for a lifetime.

I didn’t want to divorce had I married, if that could be avoided. I am not a “marriage permanence” adherent, however, as so many Christians are, because I don’t believe the Bible teaches that divorce is sin, that divorce is always wrong in each and every case.

But if I did marry, I took marriage very seriously, I didn’t take it lightly, so I was not about to run off and marry the first guy I met, or a guy who began demonstrating issues and red flags, nor did I want to marry just to avoid societal shame and pressure, or to stave off loneliness.

I wanted to marry primarily for companionship, to have someone to enjoy life with, and I wanted the relationship to be reciprocal.
I did not want a one-sided marriage, where I’m meeting all the man’s needs (such as granting consistent validation and emotional support), but he was not doing the same in return.

I think I have a very grounded, good take on marriage.

A lot of conservatives are encouraging divorce in a round-about way by shaming or fear-mongering single women over the age of 25 for being single so loudly and so often now,
I am afraid that some of these young ladies (or maybe even some of the older ones who are exposed to this garbage) may then feel pressured or shamed into marrying the first guy to come along, or in marrying any man with a pulse, and such a marriage will end in divorce.

If you marry, it should be because you have the right match, you have many of the same values and life goals, you enjoy spending time with the other person, and because you genuinely love the person

Wrong Reasons to Marry (Not an Exhaustive List)

Some “wrong” reasons to marry (that will cause you to be miserable and/or your marriage to end in divorce) include (but is not limited to):

  • marrying the wrong person,
  • marrying when you don’t feel ready for marriage,
  • marrying because conservative secular and religious figures are regularly pumping out anti-singleness commentary and dreck pressuring you or scaring you into marriage,
  • marrying because your religious faith or parents expect you to marry, or they keep nagging you to marry,
  • marrying the first guy to come along, or marry any guy, because you do want marriage, but it hasn’t happened yet, you’re in your late 20s, and all your friends are married now and you’re in a panic or are depressed about it,
  • to provide a larger population to shore up, ensure, or increase a tax base to pay property taxes and social security for future generations
    (seriously, I’ve seen conservatives actually harp on about,
    “Oh god, I am so concerned, who is going to pay for my social security later, if today’s 20 somethings don’t marry and make babies, and who will pay property taxes?”
    – getting married or having babies only or primarily to pay into social security and such are not sound reasons for the individual to marry or have children – getting married or having babies for financial reasons that benefit a society is stupid, immature, and shallow)

So pop singer Britney Spears released a new biography in which she says she only married some guy to divorce him around one or two days later because she was drunk at the time.

Marrying someone because you are drunk is an incredibly foolish reason to marry. She also says she was bored at the time.

You simply do not walk into marriage out of boredom. That’s not a mature, solid reason to marry, and it doesn’t treat the institution with respect.

By the way, I don’t have anything against Britney Spears. It sounds to me as though she has a difficult upbringing.

Continue reading “Celebrity Says She Married Briefly Years Ago Because She Was Drunk and Bored – Yet Conservatives Berate Other Women for Having Good Reasons For Being Single Over 25”

Would Jesus Shame Single Christian Women? [No, He Would Not] by G. Dalfonzo

Would Jesus Shame Single Christian Women? [No, He Would Not] by G. Dalfonzo

This single-shaming phenomenon (by Christians especially, and sometimes secular conservatives) seems to come in waves.

In the early 2000s, Southern Baptist seminary president Al Mohler began trash talking adult singleness and adult singles in radio shows and so forth, which prompted several adult, single Christians to write rebuttals of his views.

In the past couple of months, secular and religious conservatives have been shaming, insulting, and criticizing single, childless women for being single and childless – everyone from conservative and Catholic commentator Matt Walsh, to Jewish and conservative Ben Shapiro, to Christian pastor Eric Conn.

Furthermore, Christian author Lyman Stone, wrote an absolutely disgusting singles-shaming essay for “Christianity Today” last month, where he turned Motherhood into an Idol and advocates for “bedroom evangelization,” which is NOT taught in the  Bible. The Bible says the kingdom of God grows through sharing the Gospel, not through Christians marrying, having sex, and having “Christian” children.

Sorry Lutherans and other Protestants who are into “baby baptism” and so forth, but there is no “grace” conferred upon children merely for being born to Christian adults – those children grow up and eventually have to take responsibility each for their own behavior, beliefs, and choices, and either accept or reject Christ on their own.

Being born to Christian parents does not make a child “Christian.”

Some people raised to Christian parents later reject the Christian faith in their teen or adult years and become agnostic, atheist, or jettison the fundamentalism or evangelicalism of their parents to join another type of expression of the Christian faith.

The Bible teaches that the faith is grown by sharing the Gospel – not by having biological children.

(Link): Would Jesus Shame Single Christian Women?  by G. Dalfonzo

Excerpts:

Unlike some pastors today, he never suggested that the single and childless are selfish.

May 9, 2022

My friend Ruth Buchanan recounts in her recent book Socially Awkward: “I sat through a service in which the pastor characterized all single women in my current age bracket as those who, in their twenties and thirties, had not gotten married because we wanted to have fun, enjoy life, pursue careers, and ‘do our own thing’ – and in doing so, had turned our backs on God’s will for our lives, squandering our opportunities to marry and now reaping the fruit of our self-centered choices.”

As a single Christian, I could tell a few stories myself.

I’m thankful to have found a church with pastors and congregants who have gone out of their way to show support for me as a single woman. But I’ve also been on the receiving end of jokes, stereotypes, mean tweets, casual but stinging insults.

And even more common is the unintentional overlooking of singles’ needs, our situations, and our limitations: the scheduling of women’s Bible studies during work hours, for example, or conversations that consistently leave no room for any topic but families and parenting.

For readers of a Bible that goes out of its way to honor faithful single people – including its own central character! – or even to tell us that it is better to be single (1 Cor. 7:7), we single Christians seem to spend a lot of time reminding our churches that we are also part of the body of Christ. This can be exhausting and demoralizing. For some, it’s too exhausting and demoralizing to endure.

Continue reading “Would Jesus Shame Single Christian Women? [No, He Would Not] by G. Dalfonzo”

The Shaming of (Unmarried) Julia Mazur (by Conservative Nuclear Family Idolator Matt Walsh) Was a Bit Much by Z. Kessel

The Shaming of (Unmarried) Julia Mazur (by Conservative Nuclear Family Idolator Matt Walsh) Was a Bit Much by Z. Kessel

Writers of this publication (National Review) in which this essay appears are anti-Trump. I have never voted for Trump, but I don’t hate the man (I’m also not a Trump devotee).

Putting that aside, I do think much of what this author says about Walsh (or conservatives generally) is correct: that conservatives trying to “own the libs” by trashing and insulting single, childless women for being single, childless women is off the mark.

I’m a single (never married), childless, 50-something woman who’s been a conservative for years, and I don’t appreciate so-called conservatives like Walsh and others insulting women for being single and childless. A woman does not have to be married, have children, or follow traditional gender stereotypes to be a conservative or to be a woman.

You don’t have to promote marriage or parenthood by insulting single, childless adults for being single and/or childless. That tactic is needless and you’re only damaging your cause.

(Link): The Shaming of Julia Mazur Was a Bit Much

September 5, 2023

[The essay opens with the author summarizing the events, which I also provided in a post (Link): here.
Briefly: for whatever reason, Walsh cruelly targeted a 20-something, never married and childless woman who had made a TikTok video saying she hopes to marry some day, but in the meantime, she explained what activities she does while single and childless.
Walsh then insulted this woman on his X account, and said she’s “too stupid” to know how “depressing” her life is, and many of his fan boys piled on and began harassing this woman too]

… There’s plenty that could be said about the experience of a single, childless woman in her late 20s. I obviously have very little practice being one, so I’ll address something else: the sheer nastiness in Walsh’s post.

His attack on a woman who’s simply trying to appreciate what she has in life is emblematic of a broader problem on the right: the conflation of “conservative” with “jerk.” Walsh is by no means the only offender, with many other right-wing influencers solely focusing on “owning the libs.” The “owning” often stoops to bullying.

Continue reading “The Shaming of (Unmarried) Julia Mazur (by Conservative Nuclear Family Idolator Matt Walsh) Was a Bit Much by Z. Kessel”

Single Christian Women Are Much More Than Their Wombs by K. Beaty

Single Christian Women Are Much More Than Their Wombs by K. Beaty

I hope that Christianity Today magazine – where this is hosted – does not lock it down in the future.

I think the following essay is largely in response mainly to Lyman Stone’s unbiblical and deeply insulting anti-singles essay on Christianity Today’s site that was published in the week of September 4th, or maybe the week of the 14th.

I’ll only be including a few portions from the essay, not the entire thing – you’ll have to use the link below to read the piece in full:

(Link): Single Christian Women Are Much More Than Their Wombs by K. Beaty

Excerpts:

The early church elevated females for their faith witness, not their fertility. We should do the same today.

September 15, 2023

Single women are having a rough go of it lately. Their growing numbers are blamed for the rise of “woke” politics, millennial selfishness, and even incel culture [link is to The New Yorker]. In some Christian circles, single women are reminded (in case they forgot) to marry and have children, even with a gender imbalance among unmarried Christians, and even though they’re discouraged from dating outside the faith.

It’s a numerical bind causing anxiety all around.

Meanwhile, the single Christian women I know are trying to make the best of a complex reality. They seek to serve God with their daily work, invest in friendships and the church, and pursue creative and educational opportunities as they arise. Many of them also try to meet Christian men, dabble with dating apps, and pray.

… They experience cycles of hope and frustration. For most singles I know, their status is not for lack of trying, or for lack of honoring marriage as such.

…Far more, people worried about the future of Christendom—or perhaps Western civilization and its declining birth rates—are called to remember the primary way the church will be preserved through the centuries.

In sum: It’s baptism, not just babies. After all, Jesus taught it’s not enough to be born. We are all called to be born again.

Continue reading “Single Christian Women Are Much More Than Their Wombs by K. Beaty”